欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:1190876
大小:1.69 MB
页数:14页
时间:2017-11-08
《100614 日本帝人防弹丝规格对比》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。
1、Technora®AramidFiber芳纶纤维TechnoraSectionPara-AramidBusinessDepartmentTeijinTechnoProductsLimitedTechnora组准芳纶事业部帝人化工技术产品有限公司Confidential1OutlineofTechnora(R)Technora®ispara-aramidfiberindependentlydevelopedbyTeijin(Technora®是位芳纶纤维由帝人自主开发)It’smadefromco
2、polymers&producedbydifferentprocessfromPPTA’s(它是由不同的进程作出了从生产共聚物及芳纶的)Technora(R):co-poly-(paraphenylene/3,4’-oxydiphenyleneterephthalamide)PPTA:poly-(paraphenyleneterephthalamide)2ComparisonbetweenTechnora®andPolyarylateBasicPropertiesTechnora和Polyary
3、late基本性质比较Technora®PolyarylateDenier(丹尼爾)Dtex(分特)220220Strength(強度)cN/dtex24.522.9Elongation(伸度)%4.03.8Modulus(剛性)cN/dtex602530Density(密度)g/cm31.391.41MoistureRegain(水分率)%2.00.04Finishingoil(潤滑油剤)%2.5-Technora®hashigherstrengthandelongationthanOthers
4、.Technora比較其他材料具有较高的强度和延伸率3ComparisonbetweenTechnora®andPolyarylateHeatResistanceTechnora和Polyarylate耐热比较Technora®PolyarylateDecompositionTemp.(分解温度)DegreeCC度數5004005、(空气中的收缩)(400C)%0.84.5HeatresistantpropertyofTechnora®andPPTAisbetterthanPolyarylateTechnora和PPTA比Polyarylate耐热性能更好4ComparisonbetweenTechnora®andPolyarylateMITBendingFatigueTechnora和Polyarylate麻省理工学院的弯曲疲劳比较LoadBendingpointSample[Yarn]Technorashowshigh6、fatigueresistance.Technora具有较高的抗疲劳麻省理工本辛疲劳弯曲断裂循环5Compressivefatigueresistance(抗压耐疲劳)Rubbersheet橡胶板Aluminum铝SampleCord樣品Load50and100kgf×10timesCompressionFace(压面):22mmx22mm(4.84cm2)CompressionPoint(Cross)压缩点(十字)Thickness(厚度)7mmThickness(厚度)3mmCyclespe7、ed3seconds/cycle(Headspeed;10mm/minutes)循环速度3秒/周期(杆头速度;10mm/minutes)最大荷重:100kgfTestmethod试验方法6Compressivefatigueresistance抗压耐疲劳TechnoracankeephighretentionagainstcompressionTechnora可以保持对高压缩保留保留实力抗压耐疲劳7Compressivefatigueresistance抗压耐疲劳Theapparentpictu8、rebeforeandafterthecompressivetest这些明显的图片前,后压缩试验测试前侧面正面直径宽度8HeatResistance比较Technora和Polyarylate耐热性Retentionofstrengthaftersoakinginsolderfor3seconds浸泡后的强度保持3秒焊Soakingtemperature浸种温度Technora®PolyarylateBlank坯件%100100300C%9984350C%9949400C%81Melt(熔化)H
5、(空气中的收缩)(400C)%0.84.5HeatresistantpropertyofTechnora®andPPTAisbetterthanPolyarylateTechnora和PPTA比Polyarylate耐热性能更好4ComparisonbetweenTechnora®andPolyarylateMITBendingFatigueTechnora和Polyarylate麻省理工学院的弯曲疲劳比较LoadBendingpointSample[Yarn]Technorashowshigh
6、fatigueresistance.Technora具有较高的抗疲劳麻省理工本辛疲劳弯曲断裂循环5Compressivefatigueresistance(抗压耐疲劳)Rubbersheet橡胶板Aluminum铝SampleCord樣品Load50and100kgf×10timesCompressionFace(压面):22mmx22mm(4.84cm2)CompressionPoint(Cross)压缩点(十字)Thickness(厚度)7mmThickness(厚度)3mmCyclespe
7、ed3seconds/cycle(Headspeed;10mm/minutes)循环速度3秒/周期(杆头速度;10mm/minutes)最大荷重:100kgfTestmethod试验方法6Compressivefatigueresistance抗压耐疲劳TechnoracankeephighretentionagainstcompressionTechnora可以保持对高压缩保留保留实力抗压耐疲劳7Compressivefatigueresistance抗压耐疲劳Theapparentpictu
8、rebeforeandafterthecompressivetest这些明显的图片前,后压缩试验测试前侧面正面直径宽度8HeatResistance比较Technora和Polyarylate耐热性Retentionofstrengthaftersoakinginsolderfor3seconds浸泡后的强度保持3秒焊Soakingtemperature浸种温度Technora®PolyarylateBlank坯件%100100300C%9984350C%9949400C%81Melt(熔化)H
此文档下载收益归作者所有